On 18 Mar 2008, at 19:37, Stephen Bach wrote:
Shouldn't U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST work the same way?
I guess: U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP is just U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST with the substitution string as nothing, though I expect slight speed gains could be made by keeping them separate (due to no attempt to even add anything after coming across an invalid sequence — though the speed gains will be very slight).
-- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/> -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
