Okay. I'm fine with the patch.
Stephen Bach wrote:
Sorry for the ambiguity. Allow me to clarify: I meant that U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP
and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST should work the same as the other error modes.
Otherwise, what's the point of having them?
-Stephen
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 06:02:36 pm Geoffrey wrote:
On 18 Mar 2008, at 19:37, Stephen Bach wrote:
Shouldn't U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST work the same way?
I guess: U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP is just U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST with the
substitution string as nothing, though I expect slight speed gains
could be made by keeping them separate (due to no attempt to even add
anything after coming across an invalid sequence — though the speed
gains will be very slight).
--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
