Sorry for the ambiguity. Allow me to clarify: I meant that U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST should work the same as the other error modes. Otherwise, what's the point of having them?
-Stephen On Tuesday 18 March 2008 06:02:36 pm Geoffrey wrote: > On 18 Mar 2008, at 19:37, Stephen Bach wrote: > > Shouldn't U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP and U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST work the same way? > > I guess: U_CONV_ERROR_SKIP is just U_CONV_ERROR_SUBST with the > substitution string as nothing, though I expect slight speed gains > could be made by keeping them separate (due to no attempt to even add > anything after coming across an invalid sequence — though the speed > gains will be very slight). > > > -- > Geoffrey Sneddon > <http://gsnedders.com/> -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
