hi, I would rather have some kind of rules defined before opening trunk again (or the pandora box). That's what we are discussing right now. May I know why you choosed that now is the right time to do it and declare it open?
Cheers, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > Hello, > > I've just created trunk for 5.3 again. I've set the version to > 5.3.99-dev as to explicitly not decide on whether there will be 5.4 or > 6.0 next. > > New features should go to trunk; but anything other then trivial > additions should require an RFC and discussion. I think Antony has the > FPM RFC ready to show what sort of stuff would be useful to have. I'll > let Antony start a thread to discuss it (although I doubt there needs to > be a lot of discussion for it). > > I think Ilia mentioned that he wanted to do one more normal 5.2 release, > after which it will be "security fix only". So for now my suggestion > would be: > > - new features to to trunk > - bug fixes go to 5.2 and 5.3. > > Let's see what cool stuff we can come up with for the next version! > > with kind regards, > Derick > -- > http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org > Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php > twitter: @derickr and @xdebug > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
