the branching/merging is much better, so if not anything, but could solve/make thing easier, especially if we decide to work with more branches (either for cherry picking, or multiple stable branches, for example the suggested lts method)
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Antony Dovgal <t...@daylessday.org> wrote: > I really like Git (much more than SVN actually) and I use it for all my > projects, > but I doubt moving to Git would solve anything. > IMO even CVS was quite enough for our development model. > > On 11/25/2010 04:47 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > > hi, > > > > We have moved not too long ago and for what I see it gave some > > opportunities to many of us to see what are the other tools on the > > market, git and github in particular. I think 99% of the active > > developers here are on github or use git in one way or another. > > > > I think git could be a great help, maintaining multiple branches will > > be easier. It will also be very useful to develop new complex features > > requiring a longer development period. SVN works fine but merging is > > very limited and buggy, maintaining a branch while syncing changes > > from trunk/other branches is a very frustrating experiences. > > > > Please not I'm not requesting to do it now and here, only trying to > > get a feeling/poll about git usage. > > > > Cheers, > > > -- > Wbr, > Antony Dovgal > --- > http://pinba.org - realtime statistics for PHP > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
