Hi Arpad,

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Arpad Ray <array...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not against the idea in principle but still think having a security
> feature which just quietly fails if you're not using one of two modified
> handlers is really not good.
>
> I also think there's no great rush to add this, because as you say, it can
> be protected against in userland too.
>
> I would much rather have a robust, clean solution even if we have to wait
> until php.next for it.
>

As I wrote, we already had long discussion a year ago and decided to
include maintained branches.

This issue should be fixed 8 years ago. It's already too late to adopt IMHO.

If you would like to know the details of risks, please refer to the RFC.

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net

Reply via email to