> On 15 03 2015, at 16:23, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Michael Wallner <m...@php.net> wrote: >> >>> On 15 03 2015, at 15:19, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> All, >>> >>> I ran some numbers on the current votes of the dual-mode vote right >>> now. There were a number of voters that I didn't recognize. So I >>> decided to pull some stats. >>> >>> The following voters never voted before the dual-mode RFC went up: >>> >>> dom - no >>> eliw - no >>> kguest - yes >>> kk - no >>> nohn - no >>> oliver - yes >>> richsage - yes >>> sammywg - no >>> spriebsch - no >>> srain - no >>> theseer - no >>> zimt - no >>> >>> Some of these names I recognize from list (sammywg and eliw), but many I do >>> not. >>> >>> The interesting thing happens when you look at the voting direction. >>> >>> Currently, the RFC is slightly losing 70:37 (65.4%). >>> >>> If we look at percentages, 4.2% of yes voters have never voted in a >>> prior RFC. But a whopping 24.3% of no voters have never voted before. >>> >>> If we adjust the votes to remove these "never voted" accounts, it >>> stands at 67:28. Which is 70.5%. Which is basically where the vote was >>> prior to the competing RFC opening. >>> >>> I'm not saying that all of these are bad votes. Nor that they >>> shouldn't be counted. I think it does raise a significant question >>> around the voting practices. >>> >>> Something that I think we need to discuss as a group. >>> >>> So consider that discussion open. >> >> Jeez, that is becoming ridiculous. So, if you’re that good in counting, how >> many did not vote before STHv0.3? > > Is there a way to check when someone got a php.net account/karma?
http://people.php.net <http://people.php.net/>
