> Sorry, but ... even though your original RFC was very unclear about this, > everybody went by the "all votes must start by the 15th" interpretation > that > has been discussed in that thread. Do you think it's an accident that a > whopping six RFC votes started today? It isn't. > > > Please don't start reinterpreting things to fit your needs. I am > personally > totally fine with extending the PHP 7 timeline by say one month - but if > we do > that, let's make it official and applying to everyone, not just some > particular > RFC. I know for sure that there are a number of additional RFCs that would > have been submitted for PHP 7 had anyone known that it'll be allowed.
First off, this is Bob's interpretation which he brought up on Friday. Yes, ideally I would have read the original text during the discussion period and commented on it, but I didn't. I think the 3 month period for implementation (that's mostly done) and testing gives a very reasonable time period to absorb the most lax of interpretations. I think it would be a shame to delay the timeline for this, but I also think it would be a shame for the timeline - that was *clearly* not designed to create de-facto bias towards one RFC or the other - to do exactly that. Even if we were to push the timeline out by a bit, how do we do it? An RFC with a minimum discussion period of two weeks and another week for a vote? That kind of defeats the purpose. A gentlemen's agreement? Something else? Zeev -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
