Hi, all At first, Thanks for all your work put in here, Marcio. It gave me a new hint for a possible code-failure.
FYI: PhpStorm lately added an inspector for that. Glad to see that move after I heard that the RFC won't pass. https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/WI-14692 Bye, Simon On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Marcio Almada <marcio.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I had no time to reply all emails since yesterday, but right now we are > having a voting with 2 "yes" votes vs 16 "no" votes. > > I think we all agree that the RFC won't pass and I'm withdrawing the RFC > for the following reasons: > > 1. The sooner we end the voting period the better for the PHP time line. > Since there is no motives to think the voting will flip, the best > attitude > seems to be a withdraw. > 2. We are having a lot of simultaneous voting right now and some voters > care to read all the RFCs. The proposed RFC is long, requires testing > etc. > As it was already rejected, removing it from the list of RFCs in voting > phase might be beneficial to the voting process as it reduces the RFC > overload we are having because of the feature freeze. > 3. Looking at the ML, there are many controversial points that were > raised, a lot of them since yesterday. Weather they are debatable or > not, > all this controversy during voting phases is a bad thing (look at the > scalar type hints drama we had). So it's better to just put this to end > and > move on. > > Thanks for the votes, I'll try to reply to the emails anyway whenever > necessary :) > PS: I don't intend to propose this RFC again in the future as I already > have other more important RFCs planned for PHP 7.1 > > Thanks, > Márcio >
