And it will probably be in conflict with the Short Array Syntax ?
On 26 April 2016 at 13:14, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote:
> Just because HHVM is closer to PHP than C#.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Dominic Grostate <codekest...@googlemail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 19:43
> To: Dmitry Stogov
> Cc: rowan.coll...@gmail.com; PHP internals; Stanislav Malyshev
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] PHP Attributes
>
>
> Why not like C#?
>
> [Description("My Function")]
> function my_function()
> {}
>
> Without the semicolon, this wouldn't be valid in any other context.
>
> On 26 Apr 2016 8:41 a.m., "Dmitry Stogov" <dmi...@zend.com<mailto:
> dmi...@zend.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/25/2016 11:20 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> No, but this is valid:
>
> @atrr(); function foo() { ... }
>
> That's perhaps a little too close for comfort...?
> That's different syntax. If you put ; in the middle of statement, it can
> change - "$c = $a + $b;" is not the same as "$c = $a; + $b;" - but
> nobody thinks + can not be used because of that. As I said, << and >>
> are existing operators too, so if you are creative enough, I'm sure you
> can find cases like that too.
>
> Hi Stas,
>
> You may try to replace attribute syntax with @attr(...) (without
> semicolon) into our PHP parser.
> Note that we have LALR grammar + restrictions caused by semantic actions.
> If you are able to do this, I'll add it into the RFC as an option.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
