On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 10:33 +0300, Groleo Marius wrote: > > > > well, unless tuomo wears a red coat and lives in the north pole, i don't > Well he lives pretty close to it and maybe he has a red coat around, > not plastic ofc.
> > see this as a good/fair management model, keeping the Ion(tm) name is > > not worth having Tuomo as a lead non-developer...IMO > > Calm down now :). > All the suppositions/proposals I made were made to favor good directions > from Tuomo as we saw he's still around. > Tearing apart what Tuomo did in years might not be all that good for > future. i think we all made it clear that we appreciate Tuomo's work on Ion, but he moved on, and so should we... > As for the assumption "not worth having Tuomo as a lead > non-developer...IMO", see other > projects such as Vim, or crappy Linux, where the leaders barely contribute > to the project. Instead they guide it. That wasn't the point, my objection is not that the lead developer won't be doing any development, rather that it'll be "Tuomo" (s/non-developer/self-appointed-benevolent-dictator-for-life/) cheers, M Rawash
