Thanks to all for this thread: it?s important that constrained devices are included in the OCF specs and Iotivity.
> Porting it to different OSes should be possible. We're considering whether to > port to Contiki and/or RIoT, but we have no plans at this moment to do so. We > welcome contributions in that area. Within the context of this thread, I?d like to point out the Apache Mynewt project in the Apache Software Foundation. Apache Mynewt is a permissively licensed (Apache 2.0) OS for constrained devices and includes an open source Bluetooth Low Energy stack (both host- and controller-level). http://mynewt.apache.org/ The ?dev? email list is off the Community tab; discussion is welcomed there, too. Board support is listed off the main Apache Mynewt page with more to come. Note that the Nordic nRF52 is a candidate for development with BLE; uWeave (under Brillo) has an implementation on the nRF52 (albeit not with Apache Mynewt, yet), so constrained implementations over BLE are certainly feasible. best, James On Aug 3, 2016, at 15:28, Gregg Reynolds <dev at mobileink.com> wrote: > On Aug 3, 2016 5:22 PM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> > wrote: > > > > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 15:04:07 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > > On Aug 1, 2016 3:42 PM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> > > > wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > > Q: what OSes does it support? > > > > > > > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (https://zephyrproject.org) primarily. > > > > > > Can you please clarify how far along it is? Somewhere else you wrote > > > something that suggested (to me at least) that it wasn't quite complete, > > > or > > > something to that effect. Can I run Arduino101 + Zephyr + Iotivity- tiny > > > and do useful things? > > > > It's far enough along that it actually can send discoveries, reply to them, > > initiate CRUDN and reply to it, all encrypted with ACL checking, plus one > > on- > > boarding mechanism. But the API and implementation are still in active > > development and may change a lot. There are probably lots of bugs we need to > > fix too. > > > > It should be possible to use with the Arduino 101, as that device has enough > > storage dedicated to the x86 MCU. I'll check if that's the device the team > > has > > been working with. > > > > Awesome. Please upload asap! > > > -- > > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160804/5595983f/attachment.html>
