Not yet :-) I?m bringing the Apache Mynewt OS to the attention of the community. This obviously just popped up on our radar and no one in the community has stepped forward?yet. I do think that the OS is well-suited to this.
thanks, James On Aug 4, 2016, at 9:23, Paul Duffy <paduffy at cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Pace > > Did you just volunteer to produce an IoTivity port to Mynewt? > > > On 8/4/2016 12:12 PM, James Pace wrote: >> Thanks to all for this thread: it?s important that constrained devices are >> included in the OCF specs and Iotivity. >> >> > Porting it to different OSes should be possible. We're considering whether >> > to >> > port to Contiki and/or RIoT, but we have no plans at this moment to do so. >> > We >> > welcome contributions in that area. >> >> Within the context of this thread, I?d like to point out the Apache Mynewt >> project in the Apache Software Foundation. Apache Mynewt is a permissively >> licensed (Apache 2.0) OS for constrained devices and includes an open source >> Bluetooth Low Energy stack (both host- and controller-level). >> >> http://mynewt.apache.org/ >> >> The ?dev? email list is off the Community tab; discussion is welcomed there, >> too. >> >> Board support is listed off the main Apache Mynewt page with more to come. >> Note that the Nordic nRF52 is a candidate for development with BLE; uWeave >> (under Brillo) has an implementation on the nRF52 (albeit not with Apache >> Mynewt, yet), so constrained implementations over BLE are certainly feasible. >> >> best, >> >> James >> >> On Aug 3, 2016, at 15:28, Gregg Reynolds <dev at mobileink.com> wrote: >>> On Aug 3, 2016 5:22 PM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 15:04:07 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: >>> > > On Aug 1, 2016 3:42 PM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at >>> > > intel.com> wrote: >>> > > ... >>> > > >>> > > > Q: what OSes does it support? >>> > > > >>> > > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (https://zephyrproject.org) primarily. >>> > > >>> > > Can you please clarify how far along it is? Somewhere else you wrote >>> > > something that suggested (to me at least) that it wasn't quite >>> > > complete, or >>> > > something to that effect. Can I run Arduino101 + Zephyr + Iotivity- >>> > > tiny >>> > > and do useful things? >>> > >>> > It's far enough along that it actually can send discoveries, reply to >>> > them, >>> > initiate CRUDN and reply to it, all encrypted with ACL checking, plus one >>> > on- >>> > boarding mechanism. But the API and implementation are still in active >>> > development and may change a lot. There are probably lots of bugs we need >>> > to >>> > fix too. >>> > >>> > It should be possible to use with the Arduino 101, as that device has >>> > enough >>> > storage dedicated to the x86 MCU. I'll check if that's the device the >>> > team has >>> > been working with. >>> > >>> >>> Awesome. Please upload asap! >>> >>> > -- >>> > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com >>> > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> iotivity-dev mailing list >> iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org >> https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160804/3c32bfda/attachment.html>
