Maybe the simple example should be turned into an actual set of examples. e.g. representing an light device (e.g. binary switch) and also an light client.
If we have that, it would be good to set up an CI system (hosted by one of companies that is OCF member) so that we can check the device and client with CTT on conformance. Kind Regards, Wouter -----Original Message----- From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephane Lejeune (stlejeun) Sent: 04 August 2016 10:06 To: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation Along that line: The FAQ you sent was very helpful but an associated "developers kit" type of wiki page with info about what HW has successfully been targeted/build/setup/proven during the poc would be awesome. > -----Original Message----- > From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:iotivity-dev- > bounces at lists.iotivity.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Thursday, 04 August, 2016 12:22 AM > To: Gregg Reynolds > Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting repository for constrained > implementation > > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 15:04:07 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > On Aug 1, 2016 3:42 PM, "Thiago Macieira" > > <thiago.macieira at intel.com> > wrote: > > ... > > > > > Q: what OSes does it support? > > > > > > Currently, it supports Zephyr (https://zephyrproject.org) primarily. > > > > Can you please clarify how far along it is? Somewhere else you > > wrote something that suggested (to me at least) that it wasn't quite > > complete, or something to that effect. Can I run Arduino101 + > > Zephyr + Iotivity- tiny and do useful things? > > It's far enough along that it actually can send discoveries, reply to > them, initiate CRUDN and reply to it, all encrypted with ACL checking, > plus one on- boarding mechanism. But the API and implementation are > still in active development and may change a lot. There are probably > lots of bugs we need to fix too. > > It should be possible to use with the Arduino 101, as that device has > enough storage dedicated to the x86 MCU. I'll check if that's the > device the team has been working with. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > iotivity-dev mailing list > iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
