On Oct 28, 2016 5:35 PM, "Mats Wichmann" <mats at osg.samsung.com> wrote: > > On 10/28/2016 04:33 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2016 5:25 PM, "Nivedita Singhvi" <niveditasinghvi at gmail.com <mailto:niveditasinghvi at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> While the wiki page lists the names of the architects, maintainers > >> and other contacts, it does not provide an email (except for a few) > >> or other contact info: > >> > >> https://wiki.iotivity.org/projects_and_functionsrmation. > >> > >> While it's possible to hunt down some folks on the mailing list or via > >> the git tree (not always reachable, or accessible to all), it would be > >> nice to have the preferred email contact available off that wiki page, > >> or elsewhere, following the model that the Linux Kernel Maintainers > >> file takes. > >> > >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/linux/MAINTAINERS > >> > >> > >> Would the iotivity community please consider this? > >> > > > > +1 > > I know not everyone is always here all the time, but is there a problem with mailing to this list? > not sure I understand the question. personally I prefer that everything be discussed on this list, but as a matter of fact that is not what happens with gerrit. tons of stuff gets discussed only by the people included as gerrit reviewers, and the results end up presented to the rest of us as facts on the ground.
somewhere on the web there is a great article explaining why email is the best way to deal with patches (esp. wrt to linux) but naturally I cannot find it. I think this is a (relatively) major problem with a gerrit-based project. one obvious way to begin to address this is to send daily digests. -gregg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20161028/190a3448/attachment.html>
