On 10/28/2016 03:56 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > On Oct 28, 2016 5:35 PM, "Mats Wichmann" <mats at osg.samsung.com > <mailto:mats at osg.samsung.com>> wrote: >> >> On 10/28/2016 04:33 PM, Gregg Reynolds wrote: >> > On Oct 28, 2016 5:25 PM, "Nivedita Singhvi" > <niveditasinghvi at gmail.com <mailto:niveditasinghvi at gmail.com> > <mailto:niveditasinghvi at gmail.com <mailto:niveditasinghvi at gmail.com>>> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> While the wiki page lists the names of the architects, maintainers >> >> and other contacts, it does not provide an email (except for a few) >> >> or other contact info: >> >> >> >> https://wiki.iotivity.org/projects_and_functionsrmation. >> >> >> >> While it's possible to hunt down some folks on the mailing list or via >> >> the git tree (not always reachable, or accessible to all), it would be >> >> nice to have the preferred email contact available off that wiki page, >> >> or elsewhere, following the model that the Linux Kernel Maintainers >> >> file takes. >> >> >> >> https://www.kernel.org/doc/linux/MAINTAINERS >> >> >> >> >> >> Would the iotivity community please consider this? >> >> >> > >> > +1 >> >> I know not everyone is always here all the time, but is there a > problem with mailing to this list? >> > not sure I understand the question. personally I prefer that everything > be discussed on this list, but as a matter of fact that is not what > happens with gerrit. tons of stuff gets discussed only by the people > included as gerrit reviewers, and the results end up presented to the > rest of us as facts on the ground. > > somewhere on the web there is a great article explaining why email is > the best way to deal with patches (esp. wrt to linux) but naturally I > cannot find it. > > I think this is a (relatively) major problem with a gerrit-based project. > > one obvious way to begin to address this is to send daily digests. > > -gregg >
https://lwn.net/Articles/702177/ Is that the one you're referring to? thanks, Nivedita
