That sounds like a reasonable clarification to me. I believe the OCF Architecture Task Group would have to review that kind of proposal, if you guys want to bring a spec Change Request to them.
Dan From: Gregg Reynolds <d...@mobileink.com> Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 12:00 PM To: Daniel Mihai (WINDOWS) <daniel.mi...@microsoft.com> Cc: Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <nathan.heldt-shel...@intel.com>; Nash, George <george.n...@intel.com>; iotivity-dev <iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org> Subject: Re: [dev] difference between "Platform ID" and "PIID" ? On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 1:51 PM Daniel Mihai (WINDOWS) <daniel.mi...@microsoft.com<mailto:daniel.mi...@microsoft.com>> wrote: ... Nathan, I think your statement “PIID is the Protocol-agnostic ID that can be used by a Client to correlate multiple Platforms (OCF and non-OCF)” would be more clear if you used “correlate multiple Protocols”, instead of “correlate multiple Platforms”. Maybe "multiple application-layer protocols"?
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
