So can it be given a few minutes in the TSV WG in Pittsburgh, at least to
see if there is any interest/volunteers?
Brian
Scott Bradner wrote:
>
> Brian sez:
> > But the people who understand QOS are in the transport area, and so far
> > they have ignored it.
>
> "ignored" is a bit strong (see RFC 1809) but it has not been a priority
> (so to speak) in light of the other QoS developments under way.
>
> in response to Jim:
> > flowlabel should be done here or in routing area.
> > those are the people who understand it and ramifications.
>
> the use of the flowlabel as a routing process optimizer or as a QoS enabler
> or both would be a useful discussion to have
>
> Scott
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
