Brian sez:
> But the people who understand QOS are in the transport area, and so far
> they have ignored it.

"ignored" is a bit strong (see RFC 1809) but it has not been a priority
(so to speak) in light of the other QoS developments under way.

in response to Jim:
> flowlabel should be done here or in routing area.
> those are the people who understand it and ramifications. 

the use of the flowlabel as a routing process optimizer or as a QoS enabler
or both would be a useful discussion to have

Scott
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to