Brian sez: > But the people who understand QOS are in the transport area, and so far > they have ignored it. "ignored" is a bit strong (see RFC 1809) but it has not been a priority (so to speak) in light of the other QoS developments under way. in response to Jim: > flowlabel should be done here or in routing area. > those are the people who understand it and ramifications. the use of the flowlabel as a routing process optimizer or as a QoS enabler or both would be a useful discussion to have Scott -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Chart... Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group C... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IPng Working Gr... Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Matt Crawford
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Chart... Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Alex Conta
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Chart... Alex Conta
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Narsimharao Nagampalli
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Scott Bradner
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Scott Bradner
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Matt Crawford
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Scott Bradner
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Ignatios Souvatzis
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Scott Bradner
- re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter mankin
- Revised IPng Working Group Charter Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Erik Nordmark
