Brian,

>Jim, it's not just RSVP, there is also diffserv where I see a lot
>of very practical implementation people. Wouldn't you rather
>infect the TSV area with IPv6 than have them in a network area WG?

Excellent point on infecting TSV.  Ok I am sold.
I just hope the efforts are better than I have been able to do to get
dhcpv4 people to work on DHCPv6.  Mike, Charlie, and I just put together
what I think is a pretty good piece of work.  Except for Francis we have
had no input.  Unfortuneately in dhc WG they want to hear yeah or nay.
Unlike here.  We think we have addressed all persons issues which was a
real lot of work.  Anyway I am not moaning about it but trying to get areas 
to work on IPv6 is still an up hill battle.  I believe the IESG and IAB
are doing great now with IPv6 (and for awhile) now we need to get the
rest of the community on board.

regards,
/jim

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to