I would agree with that only of flow label's role is an end-to-end, or host-to-host processing. But then why bother to carry it in the IPv6 main header, which is a header that is for hop-by-hop processing? Alex Jim Bound wrote: > > the flow label should be guranteed e-2-e. clients should set it. > routers should leave it alone. > > /jim
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label JIM FLEMING
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- What "unassigned bits" in IPv4 TOS ? JIM FLEMING
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Alex Conta
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Jim Bound
- RE: Usage of IPv6 flow label Thomas Eklund
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Francis Dupont
- Re: Usage of IPv6 flow label Brian E Carpenter
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature