Hi Alex,
>As there were a good number of messages on this topic, I am not sure
>what particular message is your message in reference to, and what you
>meant to say.
>My guess could be wrong, nevertheless, if you meant to say that some
>RSVP messages may carry the IPv6 flow label, I could add that some and
>perhaps same RSVP messages may carry MPLS labels.
Agreed on MPLS for RSVP.
I was responding to the general notion that we no longer need e2e from
client to client immutable flowlabel. I strongly disagree and in fact
market expectation is now in fact we will have that with IPv6 especially
around 3GPP deployment.
Now if we can figure out away to set a bit to say in this case the
flowlabel is mutable, though I find this disgusting, I can see how I for
one would compromise and go along with it. See my response to Thomas
Eklund I just sent.
regards,
/jim
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
