Christian explained the reason. You can disagree, but
that was the resason.
Brian
Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes ("Re: An easy example of A6 unreliability "):
> > With A6 you *can* follow all the address delegations but
> > you don't *have* to. Personally I expect sites to be too
> > paraniod to have chains that go outside their administrative
> > control and you will, likely as not, get the full chain
> > returned.
>
> In which case A6 degenerates into an extremely complicated,
> special-purpose and generally badly-designed macro substitution
> feature. Surely that isn't the kind of thing that anyone would want
> in an IETF protocol.
>
> So we must conclude that the people who think A6 is a good idea must
> have some other reason. What is that reason ?
>
> Ian.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
