lwresd (thus my comment about how much it being used :-))
At 06:28 PM 6/4/2001 +0900, JINMEI Tatuya /
=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 04 Jun 2001 02:22:27 -0700,
> >>>>> "David R. Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> For v6, there are essentially no deployed resolvers yet (almost all v6
> >> name resolution that is currently done is done using the v4 DNS)
>
> > Just a data point: last time I checked (back in April), there were about
> > 100,000 unique sites downloading BIND version 9 which has a full IPv6
> > supporting resolver. How much that resolver is being used is, of
> course, a
> > different question and one much harder to answer.
>
>Just checking, what do you mean by "resolver" here? If you mean
>lwresd in bind9 or the resolver routine in BIND9 named, it's okay.
>However, as far as I know, all released BIND9 (except the very recent
>one -9.2.0a1-) do not include the "traditional" style of local
>resolver library, which can be linked with other application binaries.
>
> JINMEI, Tatuya
> Communication Platform Lab.
> Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
