Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   The problem is that not forgeting them means the same amount of
   work that doing the port in the AF independent way. So the benefits of
   the IPv4-mapped addresses (easy porting) get lost.
   
=> be serious, not all applications need access control (at least
clients don't need it and they represent more than 50%).
Not everything is like inetd or BIND...

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------