Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[horape]

�Hola!

>    i have seen that many programmers find difficult the process of porting
>    their apps to ipv6. i think that we should write a small informational
>    document that explains how to write good ipv6-compliant code.
>    itojun's "Implementing AF-indipendent apps" is a very good document.
>    however, it is obsolete and it doesn't give many informations.

> => I have done one but it is more than obsolete now. But my target
> is not AF-independence, it is IP version independence, even if a true
> AF independence (i.e. codes which can work with ISO CLNP) is a plus.

When we get IPv10, will you prefer to change all your INET6 for INET10,
or just let the AF independent code do that by itself?

> Regards
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                                        HoraPe
---
Horacio J. Pe�a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------