I know the ip stack inside and out. if we have to go to IPv10 it will be
a new IP layer protocol and by definition a completely new AF type.
This is not the case for IPv4 and IPv6.
/jim
"Shout it out G.L.O.R.I.A." (Them [Van Morrison])
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> �Hola!
>
> > i have seen that many programmers find difficult the process of porting
> > their apps to ipv6. i think that we should write a small informational
> > document that explains how to write good ipv6-compliant code.
> > itojun's "Implementing AF-indipendent apps" is a very good document.
> > however, it is obsolete and it doesn't give many informations.
>
> > => I have done one but it is more than obsolete now. But my target
> > is not AF-independence, it is IP version independence, even if a true
> > AF independence (i.e. codes which can work with ISO CLNP) is a plus.
>
> When we get IPv10, will you prefer to change all your INET6 for INET10,
> or just let the AF independent code do that by itself?
>
> > Regards
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> HoraPe
> ---
> Horacio J. Pe�a
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
