Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino]

>> > With V6ONLY you should be able to bind 0.0.0.0, 23 and bind ::,23 one
>> > using AF_INET and the other AF_INET6.
>> RFC2553 does not state this behaviour. in fact many implementations do
>> not allow to do this.
>That is unfortuneate.  I will make sure this is added to the IPv6 test
>suites at UNH and ETSI and ask folks at Sun to test for this at
>Connectathon.  KAME should be pretty much ready to test this too.

        http://www.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/kame/kame/bindtest/
        checks this case.

itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------