Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   we have only to keep the discussion within boundaries (i don't like
   flame wars).
   
=> this discussion already occured without any result (no flame war too
but only because we kept it within boundaries). It is just too late
and to get a RFC 2553 bis published is more important than to try again
to get a consensus on a subject we know it is near impossible.

Regards

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------