In your previous mail you wrote:
> With V6ONLY you should be able to bind 0.0.0.0, 23 and bind ::,23 one
> using AF_INET and the other AF_INET6.
RFC2553 does not state this behaviour.
=> I disagree.
in fact many implementations do not allow to do this.
=> fix them!
can you explain better? let's take two sockets, an AF_INET and an
AF_INET6+V6ONLY one. can i bind them on the same port only if i
bind first to 0.0.0.0 and then to ::? or is it also correct to bind
first to :: and then to 0.0.0.0?
=> both, V6ONLY removes possible interferences between IPv6 and IPv4 spaces.
RFC2553 is silent about this.
=> 2553 bis is not, reread the V6ONLY spec.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
