Re: RFC 2553 bind semantics harms the way to AF independence

[Francis Dupont]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   it seems that there are many people in favor of changing the behaviour
   of AF_INET6 sockets: itojun, pekka, me, horape, brian, erik.

=> but there are more people in favor of keeping the behaviour of
AF_INET6 sockets, they are only too bored by this discussion...

   only jim and francis do not agree.

=> don't answer in the list is not an agreement and don't forget
this discussion already happened and the current 2553 bis only reflects
the opinion of the majority at the last poll.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------