> Scott Bradner writes: >>> Yes, and it almost always means "let's ignore >>> admission control" too. >> yes, and that will be a real problem wherever the level of priority >> traffic approaches the size of the links (which could easily happen >> if video traffic gets prioritized) > And?? > The hard part of all of this is that e2e > signaling for QoS is a genuine Hard Problem. > Here you seem to acknowledge that it's needed, > but you also seem to be saying that you can > ignore if you drink the class based QoS Kool > Aide.
scott's subtle that way. notice he did not actually say he believed mr jones. the nice thing about qos is that, when the links become overbooked as in the example, qos just makes more bandwidth. randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
