Margaret,

Given there seems to be so much contention around Tony's proposal,
I agree that Scott's minimal definition along with removal
of Appendix A is a viable alternative.

            jak


----- Original Message -----
From: "Margaret Wasserman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: Flow Label


>
> Are there any IPv6 router implementations that currently
> modify the flow label field in transit?
>
> If not, I could live with the minimal change that Scott
> has proposed below (in the nature of a "bug fix" to
> RFC 2460).
>
> Scott Bradner wrote:
> >    The 20-bit Flow Label field in the IPv6 header MAY be set by a
> >    source to uniquely label sets of packets. Nodes that do not
support
> >    the Flow Label field MUST set the field to zero when originating
a
> >    packet, and MUST ignore the field when receiving a packet. All
routers
> >    MUST pass the field on unchanged when forwarding a packet.
>
> I also agree that Appendix A should be removed (it is just wrong),
> but we should NOT attempt to replace it with something that
> is more right, given today's QoS mechanisms.
>
> RFC 2460 shouldn't say anything else on this subject.  All other
> information should be handled in separate specifications (and
> WGs) including:
>
>          - How flow label values are chosen
>          - The meaning of flow label values
>          - How flow labels are/aren't interpreted by
>                  intermediate routers and/or end-nodes
>          - How flow labels can/can't be used to
>                  identify a single flow
>
> Does that work for everyone?
>
> Again, does anyone know of any current implementations that this
> would break?
>
> Margaret
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page:                      http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive:                      ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to