> And?? see http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/nsis-charter.html
but you also seem to be saying that you can ignore if you drink the class based QoS Kool Aide. no me - I did not say that Scott ---- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 29 16:55:55 2001 From: Michael Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 13:55:30 -0800 (PST) To: Scott Bradner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Flow Label In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 6) "Big Bend" XEmacs Lucid X-Face: &,heK/V66p?[2!i|tVn,9lN0TUvEv7:9FzXREj/AuzN4m<D]vnFJ>u!4x[/Z4t{V}~L]+Sk @RFNnJEg~WZ/(8<`5a),-7ukALWa^&?&D2R0CSG3kO5~#6JxLF\d,g">$%B!0w{W)qIhmwhye104zd bUcI'1! Scott Bradner writes: > > Yes, and it almost always means "let's ignore > > admission control" too. > > yes, and that will be a real problem wherever the level of priority > traffic approaches the size of the links (which could easily happen > if video traffic gets prioritized) And?? The hard part of all of this is that e2e signaling for QoS is a genuine Hard Problem. Here you seem to acknowledge that it's needed, but you also seem to be saying that you can ignore if you drink the class based QoS Kool Aide. Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
