Brian, > I don't think we should. It just starts us down that slippery slope > of creating new "foo hosts" requirements docs. Your following > arguments are reason enough to avoid this path.
Is your complaint that the document is Minimum IPv6 Requirements for a Cellular Hosts? Are there problems with the content? Do you agree or disagree with the intent of the document, which is to provide guidence on what to implement on a cellular host & what the applicability of those features are? John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
