> From: Alberto Escudero-Pascual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There is a quantitative and qualitative difference in reserving one > bit for RR or CryptoIID to enhance mobile security and even handover > performance or to reserve one bit (u) to "CLAIM" uniqueness. Uhh.. RR bit? I've not followed mobile-ip list too closely. But, if this bit is supposed to be reserved within "EUI-64 framework", I must protest! Because, ... ... it would limit home agents only to those hosts that have IPv6 address format that mandate EUI-64 interface id. Wouldn't this prevent using 6to4 address as home address? It would also exlude all future non-EUI-64 address formats (or force everyone to use EUI-64). -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
