In your previous mail you wrote:
Not much email has followed on this topic so it isn't clear whether
people are having too much fun debating other topics, think it is
a good/bad idea, or just don't care.
=> what exactly do you mean by "reserve":
- make them not available at all?
- enforce some control/rules on availability?
I think our choices are:
1. Do nothing
2. Reserve a quarter of the IID space i.e. universal=1, group=1 becomes
explicitly reserved.
3. Reserve half of the IID space i.e. all addresses with group=1 become
explicitly reserved.
=> if reserve is available following to be defined rules I am in favor of 3.
It would be good to try to make progress on the mailing list on
this question otherwise it's likely to appear on the agenda in the
meetings next week :-)
=> so we'll get a hot (and not too long, please :-) discussion thursday
morning.
BTW I have an objection to the "IPv6 over foo" only way: this assumes
there is a real link. With mobile IPv6 there are some scenarios where
the home link is purely virtual, so there is no foo...
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
