>So, this is getting a little off topic for this list, perhaps
>we should move the discussion elsewhere?
I guess so.
>I don't want to denigate the importance of SOHO and small
>networks. Small networks are OK, but designing
>something for the Internet based on an assumed small network
>configuration would be a mistake, IMHO. The 802.11
>committee made this mistake, and now we are trying
>to get some attention to fixing it.
>
>What I'm concerned about specifically is the upcoming
>deployment of public access IPv6/802.11 networks that
>have no security on ND. This is a looming real problem, and
>I'd like to see the IETF develop some interoperability
>specs to address it before it happens instead of afterwards.
>So I'm not arguing from a theoretical or assumed future
>scenerio case, but from a problem that I see looming
>right now (NTT is deploying a prototype 802.11 network in
>Kyoto at the moment).
one thing i don't understand is, why do you think it is not a problem
for ARP, and is a problem for ND.
itojun
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
