None that I am aware of? Putting SLs in DNS is the two-face problem and at least the BIND code don't deal with this yet. And I don't think it should ever do this IMO. /jim
> -----Original Message----- > From: Allison Mankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 7:50 PM > To: Tony Hain > Cc: Steven M. Bellovin; Pekka Savola; Ralph Droms; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fwd: IPv6 Scoped Addresses and Routing Protocols > > > > and the > > only reason a DNS server should return an SL address is if > the query was > > addressed to its SL address. Maybe this needs to be stated > clearly in > > the ngtrans doc on DNS issues, but this should be obvious from the > > perspective of 'don't return an answer that can't be used'. > > I would question whether this is well-understood and DNS servers > are ready to select which AAAA records to reply with depending > on the address the query was sent to. Do current servers implement > this, including caching servers? > > Allison > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
