another good point. I will have to put all this "virtual" if-then context in all the transition code. YUCK............
Come on folks lets kill them. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Alain Durand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:13 PM > To: Randy Bush > Cc: Keith Moore; Markku Savela; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IPv6 Scoped Addresses and Routing Protocols > > > > On Tuesday, June 11, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > >> it seems obvious in hindsight that private addresses were a mistake > >> in IPv4. so the fact that they exist, and that we now find it > >> necessary > >> to warn people to not advertise them in DNS, shouldn't be cited as > >> a justification to make further mistakes which will then > necessitate > >> further kludges to DNS. > > > > agree. so let's get rid of these kinky scoped addresses in v6 > > That would certainly make life in v6 land much simpler. > And anything that makes it simpler ease transition worries. > > - Alain. > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
