exactly. /jim > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 1:00 PM > To: Steven M. Bellovin > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Fwd: IPv6 Scoped Addresses and Routing Protocols > > > > I think this is the key point. Regardless of the possible > benefits of > > site-local addresses -- and I'm willing to withhold judgment on that > > point -- we don't know in detail how to make them work. At > a minimum, > > we need changes in routing and the DNS. We may need new global > > namespaces as well, with all that implies for co-ordination and > > administrative overhead. > > and given that all that stuff is "needed", and the costs > associated not just > with this infrastructure but also of the increased burden on > applications, > it ought to raise a strong suspicion that SL addresses are > not worth the cost. > > Keith > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List > IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng > FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng > Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
