> > The question more is, what do general implementations need > to implement. > In my opinion, general often equals robust. SHOULD does not mean > optional, it means you do it unless you have good reason > not to do it. > I think the burden of proof, then, would be the endpoint > which does not > implement a certain feature.
=> So are you saying should is ok? because that's all I'm saying. > I think that since HAO is used for security reasons, it may > have a strong > need to be a must than other functionality. Just my opinion. => The HAO is not needed for security reasons at all. All these arguments for SHOULD vs MUST are essentially because some people want to allow triangular routing _for_IPsec_protected_ traffic _only_. As I said a few mails back, the HAO is only accepted if the packet is protected by IPsec or if a BCE exists. Hesham > > John > -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
