Hi Pascal, > This issue seems to delay MIPv6 till the node requirement is > out;
I disagree. I think that MIP WG should specify what it thinks is correct & documents it. If the documentation is good & reasons are sufficient, I don't think that supportting it in the Node Requirements document will be a problem. John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
