Glenn Morrow wrote: > I thought it was already decided that a CN MUST respond with a rate > limited "lack of resources" response to the request for route > optimization.
Yes! > If this is the case then it seems to follow that the > processing of the HOA for this purpose MUST also be supported if the HOA > is to be a part of the request to do route optimization - but only to > this extent. Indeed. However, I believe this thread is not about the support of HAO with RO -- it is more about the support of HAO with IPsec and triangular routing. Folks are complaining that there is not sufficient reason to have a MUST for that special case. And I'm starting to agree... Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
