[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi Pascal, > > >>This issue seems to delay MIPv6 till the node requirement is >>out; >> > > I disagree. I think that MIP WG should specify what it thinks > is correct & documents it. If the documentation is good & > reasons are sufficient, I don't think that supportting it > in the Node Requirements document will be a problem.
I agree with John on this. Note also that even if the final keyword would be found in the node requirements document, MIPv6 can still be deployed as soon as its spec is out. Jari -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
