On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 10:35 AM, Michel Py wrote:
RFC1918 is not that bad without NAT, and lots of people use it without NAT as well. If I had any hint that IPv6 NAT will one day be invented and used like IPv4 NAT, I would not have this position, but this is not the case.
People start with an unconnected network, used RFC1918 style addresses, no NAT. Then, one day, they decide to connect to the Internet... ... and they realize it's "easier" (for some definition of easier) to use NAT than getting real address space and renumber their network. Now substitute IPv4 by IPv6 and you'll see IPv6 NAT.
- Alain. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
