I have a basic problem with this thread. We have a few people discussing fundamental changes in close to a vacuum. At best the result of this discussion should be a separate BCP, but before that happens operators of networks that actually use 1918 space need to be engaged to find out their requirements.
The whole idea that SL should be revoked if a global is available is bogus. It is certainly reasonable for the manufacturer of light switches to only support SL/LL rather than potentially multiple global prefixes. There is no reason for those devices to interact across a scope boundary, so the peer nodes that may also need global access MUST keep their SL to interact in the limited scope. Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
