> The issues with global vs. site-local routing in a "site" > that had multiple locations connected by leased lines were > dismissed, because the multiple locations should be more than > one "site". But, even if Wind River would be forced to have > 20-something sites by this rule, we would still probably only > have a single /48 prefix.
What rule is that? Is the routing within Wind River "convex"? Assuming it is, I don't see why you wouldn't make Wind River a single site, even if it is geographically dispersed. Rich -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
