> > is it reasonable to assume that if a network is advertising > > one or more global prefixes via ND/RD, that the scope of > > a 'site' for SL addresses corresponds to the scope in which > > those global prefixes are advertised? in other words, would > > it really be reasonable to assume that one could use SL > > addresses in some renumbering protocol and have them be able > > to reach all of the hosts/routers/apps that were affected by > > a prefix change? > > You mean, as a temporary state between renumbering between two global > addresses?
not just then - during a period prior to renumbering, during overlap, or afterward, do the scopes of SLs and prefixes necessarily coincide? I'm just trying to understand if SLs really do have utility in a renumbering protocol. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
