Hi Keith, The architecture does not require any correspondence between site boundaries and the sets of links upon which a single global routing prefix is advertised.
Margaret At 12:10 PM 11/7/02, Keith Moore wrote:
question: is it reasonable to assume that if a network is advertising one or more global prefixes via ND/RD, that the scope of a 'site' for SL addresses corresponds to the scope in which those global prefixes are advertised? in other words, would it really be reasonable to assume that one could use SL addresses in some renumbering protocol and have them be able to reach all of the hosts/routers/apps that were affected by a prefix change? Keith -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
